<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Frivolous At Heart &#187; FYI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diuternity.com/category/fyi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diuternity.com</link>
	<description>Cau7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 06:25:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Antec Black Piano Mid Case</title>
		<link>http://diuternity.com/2008/08/20/antec-black-piano-mid-case/</link>
		<comments>http://diuternity.com/2008/08/20/antec-black-piano-mid-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diuternity</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FYI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unintentional Drifting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diuternity.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This case is good for what it&#8217;s used for but it only has one 120MM fan in the back. My computer was overheating and it actually ruined the CPU paste. So I took it upon myself to cut another hole on the side of the case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This case is good for what it&#8217;s used for but it only has one 120MM fan in the back. My computer was overheating and it actually ruined the CPU paste. So I took it upon myself to cut another hole on the side of the case.</p>
<p><a href="http://diuternity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dsc03321.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-259" title="I know, it's a little messy!" src="http://diuternity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dsc03321-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://diuternity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dsc03324.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-260" title="I drew the shape out prior to cutting the hole." src="http://diuternity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dsc03324-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://diuternity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dsc03326.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-261" title="Done! It took 5minutes to cut out!" src="http://diuternity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dsc03326-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://diuternity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dsc03327.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-262" title="Installed! Now I need to wipe it down!" src="http://diuternity.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/dsc03327-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diuternity.com/2008/08/20/antec-black-piano-mid-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SATA 1 &amp; SATA 2 &amp; eSATA Differences</title>
		<link>http://diuternity.com/2007/12/14/sata-1-sata-2-esata-differences/</link>
		<comments>http://diuternity.com/2007/12/14/sata-1-sata-2-esata-differences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 03:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diuternity</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FYI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.diuternity.com/sata-1-sata-2-esata-differences/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I get so confused which SATA what plugs into where and looks like how all the time. Technology keeps on changing. Sata 1 came out and it was pretty easy and efficient. Then SATA 2 came out which was basically the same as SATA 1 with only one noticeable difference: SATA 1 had no clip [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get so confused which SATA what plugs into where and looks like how all the time. Technology keeps on changing. Sata 1 came out and it was pretty easy and efficient. Then SATA 2 came out which was basically the same as SATA 1 with only one noticeable difference: SATA 1 had no clip and would &#8220;slip&#8221; out of its port while SATA 2 had a clip device that would grasp hold onto the port it was stuck in. Here is a photo of what I speak of:<br />
<img width="438" height="*" border="0" title="" src="http://www.diuternity.com/wp-gallery/MISC/sata1_sata2.jpg" /></p>
<p>SATA 1<br />
<img width="438" height="*" border="0" title="" src="http://www.diuternity.com/wp-gallery/MISC/sata1.jpg" /></p>
<p>SATA 2<br />
<img width="438" height="*" border="0" title="" src="http://www.diuternity.com/wp-gallery/MISC/sata2.jpg" /></p>
<p>Now there&#8217;s eSATA too so we can&#8217;t forget about that! They come in varying lengths and the longest I&#8217;ve seen is six feet. It&#8217;s tailored for external use. Not something I would advise but to each his own. I like internal- safer for my setup. eSATA is the same as above except it was incorporated in 2004 to define the standard transmit and received potential: (wikipedia)</p>
<p># Minimum transmit potential increased: Range is 500–600 mV instead of 400–600 mV.<br />
# Minimum receive potential decreased: Range is 240–600 mV instead of 325–600 mV.<br />
<img width="438" height="*" border="0" title="" src="http://www.diuternity.com/wp-gallery/MISC/esata.jpg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://diuternity.com/2007/12/14/sata-1-sata-2-esata-differences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

